Hi All ,
We have 4 exchange 2010 sp3 UR14 CAS servers that too in CAS array. Due to some issue we need to remove CAS role in one server and readd the role back.
For removing I will use control panel ->programs -> Uninstall -> Deselect "CAS Role"
What about adding it back? Do I need to use Exchange installation setup package to install it back ?
Shyam
My environment
user(outlook2010)NTLM>windows(NLB)>Exchange 2010 CAS1 or Exchange 2010 CAS2
creation client access array and mailbox database to client access server array
When user join domain use outlook 2010 (NTLM) connect to Exchange 2010 CAS1，When shut down Exchange 2010 CAS1，sue windows NLB will user connect from CAS1 to CAS2，user will appear account password Authentication
is there a way user not appear account password Authentication
thanks
I have trawled the internet all day without finding a solution to this one.
When my Default Web Site (IIS) is running, I get the following error 6 times every half hour in the Application Log.
(Process w3wp.exe, PID xxxxx) "RBAC authorization returns Access Denied for user <DOMAIN>/Domain Controllers/<SERVER NAME>. Reason: No role assignments associated with the specified user were found on Domain Controller <SERVER NAME>
As far as I can see, I have no scheduled tasks running every 30 minutes, so I cannot even work out what is triggering the error.
I have seen various posts about backup permissions, but my scheduled backup is running in the <DOMAIN>\Adminstrator account, and that account is in the Exchange "Organisation Management" group, so this does not appear to be related to the problem.
Can anyone throw any light on this / help me solve the problem?
I wish to change the witness servers for my Exchange DAG failover cluster. It looks like all I needs to do is add an exchange group to the local admin of the two servers we want to move the roles to and then run the command
Set-DatabaseAvailabilityGroup
will that create the witness shares they require?
Would this be the proper procedure? Will this cause downtime and I guess this cant be installed on a domain controller as there is no local admin group? Since the DAG already exists do I need to create folders manually?
Within our backups (DPM and eVault) we are seeing a pattern in one or two users from emails that are replied to two or more times.
The user replies to their email, back to themselves three or more times and when we go to restore the message from either DPM or eVault; the body of the message only shows the first character.
We can see the full body on the live Exchange 2010 mailbox when attaching to that user's account.
This also happens when one of those multiple reply to emails is sent to another user.
Also this is not consistent with every multiple reply to message, but both backups have the same messages with the same corruption.
Make sense?
Thanks for any help on this!
Bill Bensen
We have recently renew the SSL certificate for our Exchange 2010 web server.
The only issue right now is that when people do a http://mail.mydomain.com,
I am getting a 403 - Forbidden: Access is deined. it does not auto redirect to https://mail.mydomain.com. <o:p></o:p>
I have already checked the HTTP Redirect setting of the default web site on the HUB/CAS server and "Redirect requests to this destination" is checked and the field is "https://mail.mydomain.com/owa". The "Only redirect requests to content in this directory not sub directories" is checked and status code is Found (302). <o:p></o:p>
Please let me know what else I should go check. <o:p></o:p>
Thanks. <o:p></o:p>
Hello,
I am just curious if I were to rebalance the databases by activation preference would this cause the clients to disconnect? As I understand it the database moves while the active is still doing its thing and once the copy its going to is up to date its marked as being active with no downtime.
Could someone please clarify if users will be disconnected when I rebalance?
Thanks
James
I just performed a cross forest mail migration. The distribution lists were moved via ADMT as regular groups, then mail enabled, and legacyexchangedn copied to x500. All group seem to be working fine. But I notice that one group is showing up a green/teal-ish color when you type it in the "to" field in Outlok. It gives a warning/information icon (blue circle with white "i" in the middle). All other groups show up in black color without the warning/information icon.
Why is the display name showing as a different color? I'm not sure if it's related to migration or not.
Is it possible to update a users vCard and push that to the local Outlook Contacts for all users on the domain?
Scenerio:
We copy shared contacts from the Public Folder to the users local Outlook Contacts so they sync with their phone. When an employee leaves and their number is given to someone else, how can I update that users info without everyone having to go back to the public folders and copy it? I'm trying to do this without any user involvement. So I don't want to email an updated vCard to everyone, I would rather do it on the back end if there is a way.
Please let me know if you need any more information. Thank you for your help.
my exchange 2010 server is sending out servername.domain.local this does not register on any rDNS, DNS sites so we are therefore being blacklisted with a bad reputation score.
I have been running around trying to figure out how to change this. Our PTR record shows mail.domian.com which is what our A record also shows.
Please HELP!
I am trying to list the content of the entire mailbox db to a csv file using following EMS powershell command.
Get-Mailbox | where {$_.Database -ilike "DB11"} | Search-Mailbox -LogOnly -TargetFolder "ExchLog" -TargetMailbox "AdminMbx" -LogLevel Full
It failed with following error.
WARNING: An unexpected error has occurred and a Watson dump is being generated: Cannot write to a closed TextWriter.
Cannot write to a closed TextWriter.
+ CategoryInfo : NotSpecified: (:) [Search-Mailbox], ObjectDisposedException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : System.ObjectDisposedException,Microsoft.Exchange.Management.Tasks.SearchMailbox
If I reduce the number of mailboxes in the search to ~ 7 or 8, it completes successfully. What could be the problem? Is there a limit on the size of log file?
-Phil
I have a public folder that has dozens of subfolders and I have about 70 users that need to access all of those folders, but I need to exclude access for about 20 other users from all of the folders except for 1 folder that pertains to them. I tried adding the 70 users to a group and applying permissions to all of the folders using that group, but some users that were part of that group ended up not having access to the all of the folders, despite all of the folders having permissions for the group.
My question is - What's the best way to tackle something like this?
To illustrate this better - Let's say that I have 5 users. Tom, Sherry, and Mike need access to all of the folders and Suzy & Beth only need access to the folders specific to them.
The permissions need to look like this, but on a much larger scale:
My Public Folder
hi, we have a user who is receiving emails on both on iphone and outlook. but, recently i was surprised to see there was an email received on iphone but not on outlook. after going through technet forums i thought the local OST is corrupted, then i deleted it re-synced the mailbox which sorted the issue. but this has happened to again to same user. i can see the emails before 10mins and after few mins of the time of the email in question. re-syncing is not ideal solution. any help would be appreciated. now, i started to worry that may be other people are also not receiving emails sometimes and they don't know as they don't have mobile devices.
Server: exchange 2010 sp1 & client: outlook 2007
Bhasha
Hi All ,
We are facing issue in our exchange server related to open relay.
we have 2 connectors 1 is client 2nd is default recv connector.
I have removed ms-exch-smtp-accept-authoritative-domain-sender permission from default connector to avoid internal domain spam.
but whenever we telnet from external id like gmail,yahoo etc..(from exchange server cmd) to our internal domain email id its getting delivered without any issue.
How can we prevent this in exchange 2010
I am using Exchange 2010 sp3 ru 9
All:
I currently have a standalone Exchange 2010 SP3 RU9 server that has the ChangeExpiredPasswordEnabled settings allowed in the registry. OWA and ECP are set to Forms Based Authentication. I've used a second server for reference in configuring the proper IIS and
Exchange Authentication methods to allow the settings to work, however still not functioning.
When attempting to do a self-service reset of a user password, the OWA Site spin and states that the Username and Password is incorrect or the password does not meeting complexity requirements (Default domain policy has Password Complexity Disabled). Minimum Password Age is set to 0 days. If user has expired password, the Expired Password Form does load, however once the new password is submitted the Expired Password form states the Username or Password is incorrect (even though its not).
I've used a second Exchange 2010 environment to reference, and all settings appear the same. Not sure where this is hanging up.
How can I assign Delegates via PowerShell?
Please understand I am trying to be very specific here. Don't just say set "FullAccess" mailbox permission. I want to mimic the following via EMC or EMS (PowerShell) so that I can assign Delegates administratively andNOT through Outlook as the user.
I do NOT want to set "Send-As" or "Send on Behalf" permissions. I doNOT want to use something like:
Add-MailboxPermission <alias> -User <alias2> -AccessRights fullaccess
I have tried to manually set what appear to be the proper folder permissions for what I have explained:
Add-MailboxFolderPermission <alias>:\Calendar -User <delegate_alias> -AccessRights Editor
Add-MailboxFolderPermission <alias>:\Tasks -User <delegate_alias> -AccessRights None
Add-MailboxFolderPermission <alias>:\Inbox -User <delegate_alias> -AccessRights None
Add-MailboxFolderPermission <alias>:\Contacts -User <delegate_alias> -AccessRights None
Add-MailboxFolderPermission <alias>:\Notes -User <delegate_alias> -AccessRights None
Add-MailboxFolderPermission <alias>:\Journal -User <delegate_alias> -AccessRights None
These perform the actions I want in terms of permissions, but does not allow:
- Delegate does not appear in the Delegate Access in Outlook
- Does not give you the option to send Calendar meeting requests to the Delegate
- Does not say whether they can see private items
I have searched the forums and most answers say what I mentioned above about full access or something similar. I just want to be able to actually assign Delegates and not just use the next closest thing. Any and all help isgreatly appreciated!
Hello,
I have a transport rule setup that works about 95% of the time. But on odd occasions the incoming mails bypass the rules entirely and just deliver as the original mail.
The Rule:
Conditions:
Sent to people: User1@my.domain
Actions:
Add a recipient in the To field: User1@my.domain
and Redirect the message to: User2@my.domain
The reason behind the rule is to ensure that when the "user1@my.domain" receives a mail even via BCC their address is in the To: field. This is because the "User2@my.domain" has an application that strips the attachments and puts them in a folder for the original mail recipient. The User2@my.domain account receives mail for many users to strip the attachments and needs to be able to know what mail account the mail came from hence the reason to populate the To: field as the BCC would not be known at this point.
Generally the rule works fine and the To field is populated, with the mail going to the correct accounts. But on occasion the mails just go to "user1@my.domain" and bypass the transport rules for no reason. The message tracking shows no errors and just delivers the mail to the original mailbox with no mention of the transport rules taking effect. When working you can see the transport rules making the changes and delivering the mails.
I dont believe that the rule has a problem. As testing on a lab environment we cannot replicate the issue.
Any help appreciated.
Regards
The searchcriterium from in Outlook 2010 displays as system.structuredquery.virtual.from:(Naam van afzender). This should befrom: (or van in Dutch). Has anyone seen this behaviour before?
We use Exchange 2010 and Outlook 2010 with the Dutch language pack.